Now folks, I ask you, why is NASA lying? Bush is always trying to HIDE Human Induced Global Warming, that's why.

NASA actually believes we were all born yesterday? I demand an investigation to this obvious deception and a complete investigation of the past eight years that have taken the reality of Human Induced Global Warming and attempted to turn it into a fantasy. I demand it !

Click on above photo for larger image to examine for the LOSS of ice noted in January. This is NOT a freezing event, it is a melt event

Click on this picture for examination of larger image and noted supporting ice structures in December 2008.

The melt pond is noted to be blue above. On examination of the photo above there is obvious ice supporting the shelf where the melt water has collected. Not only that but there is a consolidation of sea ice in the nearby Weddell Sea that obviously has broken apart and moved away from the continent. The lies by NASA regarding there determination in regard to these images is more than alarming. The image below is starkly worse in regard to ice loss and water runoff than the picture above.

This is the 'download' of the actual satellite picture of the same image below WITHOUT the 'up close and personal' focus. In this picture it is noted there is vast loss of sea ice and indeed the melt water in the picture above is gone. But, refrozen? Not even close. The devastation of the Summer in the Southern Hemisphere caused a dropping in the elevation of the ice shelf and the water ran off into the Weddell Sea. What occurred was a warming event whereby sea ice broke off the ice shelf and the remaining 'white surface' was the remnant of the ice that didn't yet melt.


This is the image NASA states is more likely a 'refreezing' of the pools of water in December. It is a lie. To begin this is January and SUMMER in Antarctica and the December photo is in the Southern Hemisphere Spring. In the two larger pictures above it is easily discerned from the descriptions I supplied that the melting in January is more than obvious and the change in the region is due to Human Induced Global Warming.

Ask yourself. If Bush's NASA will obvertly lie to hide the most devastating event of Earth History that we know for a fact harms human life, what else has this administration done to undermind the confidence of science and its reporting?



In the picture above NASA states that there are melt ponds causing 'the blue hue' on a remnant ice shelf near Robertson Island in the Weddel Sea on December 13, 2008. The narrative, which is at the title to this entry if one clicks on it, states, that the water was mostly likely frozen in the picture on January 2, 2009. NOT. NASA has frauduently published a report that is bogus.

King Sejong, Antarctica

Lat/Lon: 62.2° S 58.8° W

Local Time: 2:28 AM GMT (GMT +00) on January 14, 2009

Temperature :: 45 F

Conditions :: Light RAIN

Humidity :: 79%

Dew Point :: 41 F

Wind :: 38 mph from the North

Wind Gust :: -

Pressure :: 29.09 in (Falling)

Visibility :: 6.0 miles

UV :: 0 out of 16

Elevation :: 33 feet



Vostok, Antarctica

Lat/Lon: 78.4° S 106.9° E

Local Time: 8:25 AM VOST (GMT +06) on January 14, 2009

Temperature :: -32 F

Humidity :: 40%

Dew Point :: -42 F

Wind :: 9 mph from the South

Wind Gust :: -

Pressure :: in. (Steady)

Visibility :: 12.0 miles

Elevation :: 11220 feet

7 Days until Inauguration - The Electronic Classroom and its potential need and pitfalls

One of the challenges of the new administration is to keep a balance between its promise of 'State of the Art' education (Electronic Classroom - click here) and employing teachers that practice excellance.

The 'key' words here are employment, unions, education, depersonalization of education and socialization and what computer technology actually has to DETER a healthy relationship between parent-child and citizen-society.

I don't really see an America that substitutes computers for teachers. I would fully expect young Americans to learn in the presence of a human being that addresses their 'socialization' as well as their learning.

If one remembers there were psychological experiments whereby 'monkeys' were reared by 'wire mothers' as opposed to 'cloth mothers' in a controlled environment to see how well they faired. Do we, while struggling to regain our footing for our economy really want to turn over our children's education to 'wire teachers' in an electronic box OR do we see our classrooms as enhanced by electronic wizardry?

Let me see if the net has a notation regarding that study of 'non-touch' child rearing?

Okay, here are two references:
Harry F. Harlow, Monkey Love Experiments (click here)

The Nature of Love (click here)

In the circumstances below and at the title to this entry, whereby religious schools are challenged for many reasons to remain open, one of the options for children re-entering public schools is to provide 'modules' for their religious education at their homes with an understanding that parents will supervise that activity and it may or may not be included in the grading cirriculum. Heck, nuns or priests can give exams at their local parishes and provide that grade to be included in their public school record if there is no 'cross over' of church and state in that regard.

Remedial education is another possiblity and 'exception' classes that link children, adolescents and young adults that are interested in 'the same' subject, but, are in the minority of the country in that focus. It would bring expertise to many that seek that level of involvement while providing a school with an enhanced education experience for their students.

The news shook students, parents and teachers, many of whom had joined in desperate fund-raising efforts.

...This would be the second major round of elementary school closings in recent years for the diocese, which comprises Brooklyn and Queens. In 2005, it closed 25, and in the next two years, seven more. If the proposed closings are carried out, the diocese will have shut down nearly one-third of the elementary schools it had just half a decade ago....

There are certain 'street sense' reasons to maintain students in a healthy classroom environment DEVOID of electronic media, INCLUDING, cell phones and laptops. The 'two' don't mix. The 'computer generation' is turning to be social basket cases, with places like My Space and Facebook as social networking preoccupying them and using them for marketing purposes. Learning and social networking DOES NOT go together and while education should continue to be conducted in a structured classroom where progress can be MEASURED by teachers as well as 'tests' it can be enhanced by 'controlled use of technology.'

In other words, 'What would the one room school house look like with 'web casts' under the supervision of teachers? Students, regardless the age or grade can achieve with the 'help' of technology, but, left alone to use it autonomously without the enhancement and emotional competency of a teacher is complete abandonment of the 'human touch.'

So. Before Governors go 'hog wild' on destroying jobs for teachers and 'hand out' computers as candy to parents/families, they need to put THEIR BUDGETS in order that includes bolstering the budgets of school systems TO INCLUDE electronic technologies that will provide for 'special needs' of any student when they are not achieving well or coming back to the public school system from fiscally failing religious schools.

The public school system should not hold students 'hostage' to a 'lack of religious eduction' but be a welcome venue for desperate parents seeking to educate their children through religious influence while seeking high quality education in English, Geography, Science, Math, Physical Education and any other subject that comes into play.

I also don't see 'private schools' benefitting from public funding for such technology. If parents choose to use other 'types' of school models such as Charter Schools they can provide for their children in 'the ususal' manner while our public schools receive the monies from the public rhelm.

The Labor Unions need to do their jobs here and do them well. We are not a nation seeking to replace well paid and qualified teachers and they need protections from Governors seeking to 'replace' teachers and break strong unions (if there is such a thing anymore) while fiscally challenged.

There are plenty of other areas Governors can trim their budgets while supporting labor and education. The Governors' are 'used to' the Bush White House, whereby, monies are handed out for building roads and houses that 'crash' the fiscal infrastructure of the nation. They haven't yet realized how spending on roads only creates short term jobs and leaves behind a road with little revenue developement or tax base.

Shame on them.

Investing in teachers and educational infrastructure for our students means providing for a wider tax base on a longer time continuum and THAT is what we are seeking as a nation.

In example, it is high time the voters of California begin to examine closely the budget failures under Schwarzenegger and wonder if they need better leadership in California !