Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Republicans finally get what they want. They broke the back of the strongest labor union in the country.

It is time to pass The Employee Free Choice Act. (click here) The country will eventually move past this economic disaster. When it does it will need legislation that will empower the Middle Class because Labor, such as the UAW, will be blamed for the economic collapse when it had nothing to do with it. The opposition to The Employee Free Choice Act want to oppress the opportunity to build strong unions. It is time to get it done !

White House support (click here)
...President Obama and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis have both said they support the passage of EFCA as an important way to rebuild the economy and strengthen the middle class....


GM reaches tentative deal with striking US workers (click title to entry - thank you)
Posted Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:06pm AEST
...Union officials praised the contract, which also includes job security guarantees.
"We feel very good about this agreement," UAW president Ron Gettelfinger said. "I think this strike helped our side."
Mr Gettelfinger predicts GM's employment level should remain constant over the four-year term of the contract....

Monday, March 30, 2009

The USA has come to realize we are owned by private industry. In the case of GM we have to profoundly ask, is it our choice?

Better Than Expected? GM September Sales Fall 15.8% (click here)
General Motors dealers in the United States delivered 284,300 vehicles in September, giving GM its best monthly share so far in 2008.


How many lifetime employees walk away with this for a retirement haul. And it is being given to him AFTER the AIG mess. Not bad Mr. Wagoner.

PAYDAY: GM's Rick Wagoner Drives Away with $20M Retirement (click title to entry - thank you)
Critic Calls Multi-Million Package "Perfect Example" of Frustration with Industry
By MICHELLE LEDER and JUSTIN ROOD

March 30, 2009
...Although the Treasury Department has barred GM from paying severance to Wagoner or any other senior executive, Wagoner is eligible to collect millions in retirement benefits from his former employer, according to the documents reviewed by ABC News...

This is our baby, by the way. If one recalls it was the close of the Bush Presidency when he came forward to support the new President-Elect. Yep. We called for a program to protect labor and its retirees (Didn't know Wagoner was included, but, contracts are contracts, I suppose.). So, we have no one to blame but ourselves on this one. So far it has been an important step to realize we wanted to salvage GM, but, we didn't bargain for failure before success. It was determined the automakers were important to the American landscape, not only from an aesthetic perspective, a matter of national pride, employment but also for national security.

We haven't done badly. So far, Ford is surviving the best without need for assistance and Chrysler is seeking to stay afloat with a merger most people expected would happen eventually. Some also anticipated a further bailout of GM while hoping they were wrong.

Americans are working today in good paying jobs at GM regardless of its management failure. If the USA can rid the organization of its CEO, it can assist in the future direction of the type of vehicles that come out of the factories as well.

Let's get this thing right and return 'reason' to American manufacturing. American Automakers have to realize they can't dictate auto availability forced down the consumer's throat by lack of choice, technology and 'jazzed up' commercials. If I were CEO of GM, I would concentrate on highly efficient 'green' automobiles and manufacture as many of those as the market will bear while manufacturing only to order other vehicles less green and less desired by Americans.

I hope the unions have strong suggestions for the continued operation of GM, including market studies regarding models that actually sell.

Contact Notre Dame. They are appauling. I cannot believe they are religiously bigoted to fellow citizens of this country.

Christian Bigotry (click title to entry - thank you)
'Although Christianity does have its good points, the exclusive nature of many Christian sects opens the door to Christian bigotry. Christian bigotry is a disgusting and insidious evil. To Christian bigots themselves, their bigotry is usually invisible. It disguises itself as piety and righteousness. But to non-Christians at the receiving end, it is often plain old unadulterated bigotry....


Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C. (click here)

It is amazing. REV seems to insulate himself from contact. Maybe he spends most of his day in prayer. The best contact information is below, if one calls the main switchboard I would imagine someone might even be able to reach his office.

Everyone knows the drill !!!!!

And to think I nearly consented to sending my son to school there. Wow.

When Presidents are asked to speak anywhere, including their own fund raisers with people of the same mind, it is the 'majority' country they represent. No one can get away from that. When a President is asked to speak it is with the understanding he or she represents the entire nation and not the 'particulars' of one faith or persuasion.

The exception to that understanding may have begun 'unsuccessfully' by George W. Bush, but, he abused the powers of his Presidency for political reasons while oppressing and ridiculing through 'exclusivity' citizens with needs for individual rights. He did not respect the separation of church and state.

President Obama was completely inclusive during his inauguration, even to his ridicule by some citizens. He did it bravely. He did it without concern for politics. I cannot believe Notre Dame is actually bigoting themselves, AS EXAMPLE, to their students and the nation. They should be ashamed.

Contact (click here)
Committee information is udpated annually. Should you have revisions to committee information, please contact Micki Kidder at mkidder@nd.edu or complete this form and return to:
Micki KidderAssociate Director, Office of the Board Secretariat

Office of the President
405 Main Building
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Phone: 574.631.6526
Email: committees@nd.edu


Why Notre Dame Should Welcome Obama (click here)
By Kenneth L. Woodward
Monday, March 30, 2009; Page A17
The nation's Catholic bishops have another sticky issue on their plates. President Obama has accepted an invitation to deliver the commencement address at the University of Notre Dame in May and to receive the customary honorary degree. It is quite a coup for the nation's most resonantly Catholic university. American Catholics and their bishops should be proud.

But the bishops have a policy that says "Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our [Catholic] fundamental moral principles." Upon taking office, Obama lifted Bush administration restrictions on funding for abortions and for embryonic stem cell research, as he had promised to do. Both actions violated fundamental Catholic principles on the protection of human life.
Although the bishops' policy is directed at dissident Catholic politicians such as Sen. Ted Kennedy, Notre Dame is being criticized for putting institutional prestige ahead of moral principle by allowing its graduating class to hear from the president of the United States, who is not a Catholic. And at least some Catholic bishops agree with the critics....

CHARLES DHARAPAK / Associated Press
President Obama in Washington last week. Some oppose his talk at Notre Dame, citing abortion and other issues.
Posted on Sun, Mar. 29, 2009
Head Strong: Giving Obama a listen at Notre Dame (click here)
By Michael Smerconish - Inquirer
Inquirer Currents Columnist
Some call his invitation to speak in May a travesty, but why shouldn't he speak? At a time of so much incivility, from politics to sports, his visit should not be denied.

Here's a postcard from South Bend, Ind., where sports fans and some spiritual types have at least one thing in common: Neither is afraid to yell from the sidelines.
The University of Notre Dame announced that President Obama had accepted an invitation to speak at the school's May 17 commencement. The president, of course, supports abortion rights, civil unions, and funding for stem-cell research - positions that don't correspond with the Catholic teachings that underpin an institution like Notre Dame....





Bush Country (click here)
BY R. Bruce Dold
...They saw and admired a man of faith, resolve and optimism. They saw a president who understood that this was a critical moment, that the nation was vulnerable in a way that it had never been in its history. They had their eyes wide open.
George Bush’s America does include those who view themselves as conservative, evangelical Christians. That’s about one in four voters in this country. The growth of the evangelical movement is one of the great stories largely missed by the news media in recent years....



March 23, 2009
Is Bush an appropriate commencement speaker for Notre Dame? (click here)
I do not envy the administrators who have to choose commencement speakers at Catholic colleges and universities, and I do not have any bright-line rules in mind for navigating these issues, so please take these questions as sincere and snark-free: Given George W. Bush's record on the death penalty as Governor of Texas, should Notre Dame have invited him to be the commencement speaker in 2001? And now given what we know about his record on torture as President, should Notre Dame invite him to be commencement speaker in 2009? If Bush is fine, but Obama is not, how exactly do you articulate the difference in terms of appearing to support those who "act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles?" Abortion stands alone as a disqualifier? Some other explanation?

If Mike believes its possible then it must be.


The workers at GM Plants and those fired and laid off should have a job action and occupy the plants. I don't care which ones and if the doors are locked. If there is going to be plant closings or bankruptcy then occupy the factories and force union ownership. Produce the cars themselves !

Even Workers Surprised by Success of Factory Sit-In (click here)
...There was a murmur of shock, then anger, in the drab room lined with snack machines. Some women cried. But a few of the factory’s union leaders had been anticipating this moment. Several weeks before, they had noticed that equipment had disappeared from the plant, and they began tracing it to a nearby rail yard.
And so, in secret, they had been discussing a bold but potentially dangerous plan: occupying the factory if it closed.
By the time their six-day sit-in ended on Wednesday night, the 240 laid-off workers at this previously anonymous 125,000-square-foot plant had become national symbols of worker discontent amid the layoffs sweeping the country. Civil rights workers compared them to Rosa Parks. But all the workers wanted, they said, was what they deserved under the law: 60 days of severance pay and earned vacation time....

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Morning Papers - Its Origins


The Rooster
"Okeydoke"

Earth Hour



Xanterra Parks & Resorts (click here)
Bringing carbon dioxide Savings to National and State Parks
Xanterra Parks & Resorts operates lodges, restaurants, and other concessions at 18 national and state parks. As the first hospitality company with an absolute greenhouse gas reduction target, Xanterra aims to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by 10% below 2000 levels by 2015. By 2004, Xanterra was already nearly halfway to reaching its goal with emissions 4.75% below 2000 levels. In 2006, Xanterra is using 6,011,723 kilowatt hours of renewable wind, solar, or geothermal energy, totaling more than 7% of total energy use at its operations nationwide. This prevents 2,300 tons of carbon dioxide from being emitted. Wind power provides 50% of Xanterra's electricity at Crater Lake and Zion, and a third at Mount Rushmore. In addition to renewable energy, Xanterra is reducing emissions through fuel switching (from heating fuel oil to propane), strategic conservation programs, energy control systems in rooms and facilities, and efficiency upgrades including 27,000 lighting retrofits. Xanterra is one of only a few hospitality companies to construct buildings that have achieved the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED green building rating system certification (one at Yellowstone and another being built at Crater Lake National Park). Last year the company designated its own company-wide CAFE standard of 35 miles per gallon for all company vehicles purchased.



Removing the Death Penalty. What does that do to incarceration and the courts?


House Votes to Repeal Capital Punishment (click title to entry - thank you)
By Dan Gorenstein on Wednesday, March 25, 2009.
New Hampshire House lawmakers shocked many today when they voted to repeal the state’s death penalty.
The measure passed by 19 votes, one-hundred ninety-three to one-hundred seventy-four.
This comes after a jury sentenced Michael Addison to death last fall for the murder of Manchester Police Officer Michael Briggs.
New Hampshire Public Radio’s Dan Gorenstein reports.

This year death penalty opponents had their hopes on a bill to study the issue.
That measure sailed through the House.
Nobody, really, thought the bill to repeal the death penalty had a chance.
In fact, many members left their seats, or chatted as the first few Representatives spoke in favor of the legislation.
But then....
TAPE: the chair recognizes the member from Hampton, Representative Cushing....Thank you Madame Speaker, members of the House....
....Democrat Renny Cushing started talking about how his dad was murdered.
TAPE: my father was sitting at the kitchen table reading Foster’s Daily Democrat, and my mother was on the couch watching the Boston Celtics playoff game...There was a knock on the front door....my dad got up to open it...and two shotgun blasts rang out, turned his chest into hamburger and he died in front of my mother in the home they lived in for 35 years and raised their seven years.
On hearing such intimate details, House members grew quiet and leaned forward.
Cushing went on.
TAPE: an old friend came up to me and he said, ‘you know Renny, I hope they fry the bastards. I hope they fry the bastards so your mother, and you and your family can get some piece.”
But he says he didn’t have the “normal” reaction to his father’s murder.
On principle, Cushing had always opposed to the death penalty.
And he said, if he changed his opinion in the wake of the murder, he would only give his father’s murderer more power.
TAPE: because not only would my father be taken from me. But so would my values. And it’s the same for society as it is for individuals. If we let those who kill, make us into killers, than evil triumphs. And we all lose.
SFX: That was amazing, honey. That was amazing.
After the vote, teary eyed lawmakers greeted Cushing, people patted his back, others just gave long knowing looks....

Federal shield law moves out of House committee


U.S. · March 25, 2009
The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday approved a federal shield bill that aims to protect journalists from compelled disclosure of their confidential sources, in language identical to that of a 2007 bill that overwhelmingly passed the U.S. House of Representatives. The new bill heads next to the floor for a new, full House vote.
The
Free Flow of Information Act of 2009, or H.R. 985, would offer a qualified privilege for journalists, meaning they could not be compelled to identify sources or hand over confidential material except under several scenarios: If doing so would prevent harm to national security, or death or bodily harm; if it were essential to the investigation, prosecution or defense of a crime; if it were deemed "critical to the successful completion" of a legal, non-criminal issue. Also, a reporter could be pressed for confidential information if it were necessary for pinpointing who leaked trade secrets, certain health data or classified national security information.
The bill defines a journalist as someone who "regularly" reports and writes "for a substantial portion of the person's livelihood or for substantial financial gain."...

Former McCain Adviser Endorses Same Sex Marriage


Steve Schmidt and John McCain
Photo: AP
7/23/08 at 10:30 AM
Holly Bailey
Steve Schmidt, who was John McCain’s chief political strategist during the campaign, has largely stayed out of sight since the election. He went back to California, where he lives with his wife and kids, and went back to work as a consultant, though he no longer formally advises political candidates. During the campaign, Schmidt made no secret of the fact that his personal views often ran far to the left of his party. In an interview this week with the Washington Blade, Schmidt, whose only sister is gay, came out in favor of marriage rights for same-sex couples and called for the Republican Party to be more inclusive of gays and lesbians. “I am personally supportive of (marriage) equality for gay couples, and I believe it will happen over time,” Schmidt said. “I think that more and more Americans are insistent that, at a minimum, gay couples should be treated with respect and when they see a political party trying to stigmatize a group of people who are hardworking, who play by the rules, who raise decent families, they’re troubled by it.” The former McCain strategist told the paper that he voted against Proposition 8, which ended same-sex marriage in California....



Thursday, March 26, 2009
Last updated 2:52 p.m. PT
House committee approves expanded rights for domestic partners (click here)
State Senate had previously OK'd same-sex domestic parnership rights
By CHRIS GRYGIEL

SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF
A state House committee on Thursday approved a measure that would give same-sex domestic partners all of the rights married people in the state get.
Senate Bill 5688 passed out of the House Judiciary Committee by a seven to four vote. Rep. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, said he expects the bill will now be referred to the House Ways and Means Committee. Pedersen, a long-time supporter of expanded rights for gay couples, said he's confident the measure will ultimately pass.
Earlier this month SB 5688 passed out of the state Senate by a 30-18 vote.
The bill adds domestic partners to all remaining areas of state law where now only married couples are addressed, statutes ranging from employment to pensions....




Same-sex marriage wins by 7 votes (click here)
After hours of debate, bill sent on to Senate
By DANIEL BARRICK

Monitor staff
KEN WILLIAMS / Monitor staff University of New Hampshire students (from left) Morgan O’Neil, Erin Thesing, Rebecca Romanoski and Jenelle DeVits react to a first vote shooting down same-sex marriage. The House then refused to table or kill the bill, and it passed on a second try.
It took a while to make up its mind, but the New Hampshire House voted yesterday to allow same-sex couples to marry.
The bill, which will now head to the Senate, passed by a seven-vote margin. Gov. John Lynch, a Democrat, has said he opposes same-sex marriage, but he has not said whether he would veto a bill allowing it. He supported legislation two years ago that legalized civil unions for same-sex couples, and a spokesman for Lynch indicated yesterday that the governor was satisfied with the status quo.
"The civil unions bill he signed into law prevents discrimination and provides the same legal protections to all New Hampshire families to the extent that is possible under federal law," said Colin Manning, Lynch's press secretary.
Yesterday's House vote of 186-179 was cheered by gay-rights activists and others who watched from the House gallery. But the result came after hours of debate and several roll call votes that failed to achieve a majority for any course of action....

How much does your President love you? As Chief Executive to the Country, how could food contamination have been tolerated?

Who was 'safeguarding' the country for eight years? No one? It would seem as though 'belief principles' replaced science and monitoring at a time when National Security needed to address in every aspect the protections of our food system.

I haven't yet 'counted' the number of infringments of human rights existing in the USA under the Bush administration, but, it has to be a record setter.

DEREGULATION, budget cutting and downsizing government in vital areas of National Security is NOT an option.

In a country that is supposed to value 'health' and 'access' would find it more prudent to prevent disease than treat it. A country that has NO vested interest in the cost of health care would find it better to defer 'survival' to those that could find access and treatment through wealth while removing all safeguards in the way of government regulation. Dereglation 'at any cost' provides profit to companies that want to squeeze every cent or fraction there of out of their products.

What occurred in the eight years of the Bush Administration that actually facilitated a $14,000 DOW?


Planter: ‘It’s safe to eat peanuts’ (click here)
Mississippi man comes to Georgia to talk up the peanut, which is still suffering from the salmonella scare.
By Mark Davis
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Don Self has come from Hamilton, Miss., to Atlanta this weekend to spread the word: You need Arachis hypogaea.
That’s what scientists call that gooey stuff in the jar, the bag of edibles you get at the Braves games. We call them peanuts.
“We’re trying to let the public know that it’s safe to eat peanuts,” said Self, handing out free stuff at the Health & Fitness Expo on Friday at the Georgia Dome. The festival continues today....



Judge: Bush White House Wanted Right-to-Lifers on FDA's Contraception Panel (click title to entry - thank you)
By Jim Edwards

March 24th, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
A federal court ruling on Teva’s Plan B “morning after” contraceptive reveals how the Bush White House corrupted the internal operations of the FDA, encouraged decisions not based on science, and led to months-long delays in approvals process.
Judge Edward Korman’s ruling makes Plan B (pictured) available over-the-counter instead of behind-the-counter, ending a long and wasteful drama over Teva/Barr’s contraceptive.
The ruling describes in juicy detail how the Bush Administration twisted the FDA in knots in order to appease right-to-life constituents who were opposed to young women getting contraceptives. The office of the commissioner even proposed right-to-life campaigners be added to an advisory committee on Plan B.
The judge wrote that “These political considerations, delays, and implausible justifications for decision-making are not the only evidence of a lack of good faith and reasoned agency decision-making.”...

There are many Malawi children needing a home. I am not surprised Madonna would seek another to love.



...Malawi Children's Village (click title to entry - thank you) is a home based orphan and other vulnerable children support program in Mangochi, Malawi. It now supports over 2000 orphans in 37 villages whose parent(s) have died of HIV/AIDS...

Saturday, March 28, 2009

What do you say to a country that has become cynical of their government? (click title - thank you)

Rachel Maddow and Michael Moore Say Barack Obama Is Just Like George Bush (click here)
By John Cook
10:00 AM on Sat Mar 28 2009, 5,966 views
The attack from Obama's left flank began in earnest yesterday, as two reliably liberal forces openly compared Barack Obama's plan for escalating the war in Afghanistan to Bush's fiasco in Iraq.
Obama fangirl Rachel Maddow put together an Obama-Bush mashup on last night's show, playing Obama's speech announcing his Afghanistan plan next to clips of Bush talking about Iraq, and pointing out the eerie similarities. She hesitantly defended Obama—or at least seemed like she was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt—but it was clearly a shot across the bow.




It is somewhat alarming the "eerie similarities" of the 'vocabulary' that surrounds war. I am confident it appears to be 'the same war in the same way.' Is it? Some are saying Afghanistan is Obama's Vietnam. Is it? Are we following NATO into hell no different than Johnson's USA followed SEATO? Possibly.

However, there are MARKED differences in the rhetoric that some are NOT identifying or addressing and I have to alarmed at THAT reality as well.

In the years of Vietnam we were chancing a ghost called, The Domino Theory. Certainly if South Vietnam were to fall the rest of the nations and ultimately the USA would fall to a Cold War enemy called Communism. In FEAR of that reality, Nixon's USA built a faux government in Saigon and called it a progressive democracy when all it consisted of was a similar circumstance behind concrete walls such as Baghdad.


Some say CURRENTLY, Kabul is Obama's Saigon. The sad truth is that it isn't Obama's Saigon, it is a BUSH and RUMSFELD Siagon. One of the sad realities we all touted in opposition of the 'war agenda' was that Afghanistan was abandoned by Bush for an oil war in Iraq. Is that not true? I believe it is. Certainly, if the last five and a half years of Iraq and Baghdad were concentrated on Afghanistan the global community would be far safer than today and Afghanistan, Pakistan, Cashmir, India and Iran may already have a workable solution for a peaceful economy that ENHANCES the region of Arab Nations ALREADY conducting peaceful societies with benevolent agendas for their people. Jordan is not a peace based economy and nation? Egypt? Saudi Arabia? Hello?


The 'rhetoric' is really quite amazing. I was astounded to realize how the 'sameness in vocabulary' pervaded both administration when it comes to 'the choice' of addressing 'the enemy' and other 'aspects' of war. After all, it is Obama that never voted for war funding for Iraq and has demanded the return of troops from Iraq, regardless of the long drawn out reduction of forces now currently planned. Was promising a sixteen month troop reduction simply a way of saying to the American people sceptical at all of any withdrawal that, 'it was okay to vote for Barak, because he is the man of reason?' Hm?


To simply state, in terms not stated but expressed, our new President is as much a puppet to the military as perhaps Bush due to 'dictation' would be to say the USA has a Military Industrial Complex that is out of the rhelm of control by its people and we are subject to its demands. That my friends is NOT a deomcracy, it is a 'managed' political state whereby the military is in control. I see. Is the USA actually a Pakistan in disguise or in denial with a faux President that might be better called General? I don't think so.


Why then is there not a Gerald Ford solution to Iraq? Why do we have to RETURN to the 'theater' of Afghanistan? Haven't we suffered enough in the death of our children and can't this President simply bring home the troops and close the borders so we are safe? Would we settle for that? Is it realistic? Could NATO be the real issue and all the struggle in Afghanistan and Pakistan is simply an illusion like Vietnam where INDEED The Military Industrial Complex sincerely did have control of the USA's '? peace ?' agenda.


To begin, this is NOT the 1960s or The Silent Majority. We did learn from those idiotic and meaningless warring years. The troops from Vietnam were brought home and we enjoyed a 'peace time economy' for decades that followed. So, to say we as Americans are doomed to be dominated by our military isn't realisitic, it is reactionary.

Civilized societies do feel pain. They do not advocate torture or seek to war. Troop loses are profoundly felt and in the case of "W"rongful wars it is direly felt by all those that 'realize the truth' with every death like Chinese Water Torture. There goes those 'Chinese' implications again. Hm?



So. Like. What is it with the rhetoric? Did the military Psy-Ops actually kidnap the President in his sleep and 'do a number on him?' Nah, that is too sci-fi. Not to make light of an issue that has brevity, so like what's up?


It is the same military with Generals that have been around for decades. It is the same vocabulary because it is THE SAME military. Charlie, Baker, Einstein. It is also the same Secretary of Defense, oops, back in the day it was Rumfeld. But, sincerely, the military is regimented so in a 'sad' way there is a lot of 'sameness' in its mechanisms and 'cultural' implications. AND. What do you call a terrorist, except, a terrorist? How do you say there are known threats to the USA by terrorists, except to say, "There are known threats to the USA by terrorists." I remind, it was the days BEFORE September 11th that the Bush/Cheney White House completely dropped the ball. It was the "Bin Laden Known to Strike the USA" that Condi Rice could never explain away. It was the reports from Germany that was never given brevity. Remember? The 911 Commission and all that.

I mean there was a September 11, 2001. Certainly THAT is real enough to classify as THE TRUTH.

The profound difference, that rhetoric ignores and seeks to desanctify, is the enemy. In Vietnam it was a 'concept' of world domination. The enemy in Afghanistan and that has exploited Pakistan and probably Kashmir is real. We aren't fighting a 'concept,' we are fighting to defeat 'an entity' that is KNOWN to kill innocent people from within the borders of their country by using their own infrastructure. The 'enemies' in Vietnam AND Iraq were contrived. They were based in 'fear' and elements of 'possibility.' The USA does have enemies. Only. This time. It isn't a nation that can be invaded. It is THE LACK of a sincere government in countries sadly ignored and controlled by more powerful nations to keep war from the borders of powerful players and instead played out in regions such as Afghanistan.

I refuse to put blinders on to the dangers of terrorist networks allowed to grow in the last eight years, inspired by victories of al Qaeda and the weakening of civilization. I didn't expect, nor do I think, President Obama expect the sincere reality of the 'vigor' of The Taliban and its affiliations with al Qaeda that actually allows Mullah Omar to entertain a return to Kandahar. That is completely bizarre.


I am impressed by the prowess of Secretary Clinton and her 'rigorous' agenda with all the nations of region of Afghanistan. I am impressed by her ability to draw the attention of Russia to an agenda of peace and 'inclusion' of a NATO activity. I am impressed by a Karzai I witnessed yesterday with renewed consent to battle an enemy the world sincerely regards in 'unison' as an enemy worth defeating.


Karzai Says US War Strategy 'Better Than Expected' (click here)
By Barry Newhouse Islamabad
28 March 2009
The presidents of Afghanistan and Pakistan welcomed the Obama administration's new plan for the conflict in the region on Saturday, with each highlighting key parts of the strategy for praise....


If I thought for one minute, I was reacting to fear, willing to endanger civilian lives or disregard the pain I feel for every military soldier facing a fate in battle for some irrational exchange of ideation or domination by the USA Military Complex, I won't entertain for one minute 'the idea' that a continued war in Afghanistan that also includes regions of Pakistan. I would be stating as I have always stated regarding Iraq. We don't belong in Iraq. We never did. I can sincerely say, there is UNFINISHED and ABANDONED business. It is NOT 'local' issues of civil war. It is not a matter of uniting Pakistan and Afghanistan as if it were a Kurdistan. It is about actual events, actual dangers and the desire for civlization to 'victor' its potential and win its safety.

This is about towers crashed to the ground, civilians dead, airplanes used as bombs and a Pennsylvania farm field evidenced to the struggle of our people against an invading force.


There is no one a bigger BELIEVER of the talent and insight of Michael Moore. There is no one that would seek to engage his ability to 'police' the government and its depersonalized ability to control the fate of its citizens more than I. The 'LEFT' as it is called has talent beyond anyone's willingness to say. It has insight that is disregarded for its potential to change the dynamics of business and wealth. It is characterized all too often as socialist when in fact it is conservative with an ability to 'realize' shortcomings of what any democracy is rightfully responsible. "The Left" in politics doesn't believe in causing pain. It believes in 'resulting' justice that a democracy, of...by...and for the people...is supposed to be responsible for. The Left believes in 'the promises' of our forefathers. It believes in a responsible society with 'realistic' platforms that work for its citizens. It isn't about postponing human issues, it is about addressing them in a timely and forthright manner that is dictated by compassion and human rights.

I don't seek to ridicule any of those I would consider as peers. I would seek to elevate their concern while advocating for reason and potential for shortsightedness, while indeed, I will examine any that I am guilty of.


I trust Barak Obama. At. Least. For now.

The Midwest may be catching a break. Click title for 12 hour loop.


March 9, 2009
1830z
UNISYS Water Vapor Satellite of the North and West Hemisphere

As is the case in this dynamic called Human Induced Global Warming, it waxes and wanes and there have been innumberable instances that have exhibited exactly that.

It would appear the 'system' currently causing much of the percipitation and freezing temperatures is reaching a maximum and the 'contributing' water vapor is somewhat diminished.

The interesting aspect to all this is the 'arctic' circumstances that have kept ground water frozen and unable to contribute to higher flood levels may actually still be a problem if the temperature warms enough and ice becomes a tributary to the Red River. That dynamic will eventually become a reality as Spring moves into Summer, but, hopefully it won't happen in a manner that adds to the mass of water currently flowing south.

It is a bit too early to call this a prolonged break that will resolve so people can go home. In my opinion, the actual dynamic that desperately has to be addressed is the fact the flooding of the Red River has been consistently a problem and the likelihood of this river resolving to a SAFE level is not likely.

In recalling last year and I believe the year before, Spring and Summer saw a chronic arrival of drenching rains from the Gulf through the entire Midwest. There is no reason to believe this year will be any different and Hurricane Season is on the way. With all the 'seasons' of tornadoes and one type of storm or another extending beyond what is 'normal' there is every reason to believe this season will see an early hurricane season and probably a prolonged one was well. I doubt tornadoes will give us a break and if the 'trend' of the last four years continues, the less hurricanes we have the more tornadoes occur.

According to the 'predictions' there are a few 'significant' storms with a potential for fourteen named storms. (click here) That is somewhat of a mild season, except, these years since 2002 aren't 'normal' seasons as they are dynamically effected by Human Induced Global Warming. So, while the water vapor may be diminished in the number of storms that occur it is questionable to the degree they do damage as they are stronger, wetter and having a higher degree of unpredictability under 'warming' conditions.

So, in regard to the Red River, the conditions that exist in the region are of saturated ground, with erosion and undetermined damage in subsoil stability due to repeated flooding conditions. In other words, after the negligent administration of the last eight years, we don't know what we have and studies have to proceed to determine the degree soils have changed and subsoil conditions could be adverse to communities along the river.

In the short term, MONITORING the Red River needs vigilance and attendance to river gauges along the entire system. Astute scientists with knowledge of geology, hydrology and an understanding of the communities and their dependence on the river for its benevolence are essential to the future of these towns and states. Both climate specialists and biologists are also important as the dynamics of water movement is guaranteed to change weather patterns, hence, changes to species dynamics and potential for threatened, endangered and invasive species. The farming communities don't need tropical systems from Indonesia carrying a crop disease foreign to American farmers with an understanding too late to act to protect their yields.

The unfortunate reality this new administration has to face is the huge degree of negligence of the past eight years to these sciences and their potential to protect the interest of our nation, including its communities and agriculture. Literally, the country is a mess. It is a mess in every department of the President's cabinet and the disrepair we find ourselves in also includes the underfunding of our sciences that act as part of upholding the dignity of industries such as agriculture.

To accurately predict when communities will be safe from river levels is tenuous and knowing the American people at the first glimmer of hope that storms are abating and river levels are coming down, they will head to their homes and attempt to resume their lives. So, predicting 'safe' conditions isn't really the issue, it is protecting the public from themselves when they seek to return to reestablish their lives that is the issue. The Red River has to be a work in progress that starts today and goes forward with chronic monitoring, assessing and modification. There won't be a 'safe' situation so much as a 'managed' circumstance that has flux built in to its vigilance.

Public officials, hired or elected, can seek to reach communities to empower a sense of urgency for evacuation with daily reports of river conditions and weather anticipations. The public has to come to terms with its circumstances and realize suddenly they may have to move to safety. During this time productivity of daily living can continue and the work of agencies involved in 'controlling' the river to the extent they can to prevent damage to communities will eventually reach a point where 'the river' is simply a body of water that flows by. There will be a point in time when flooding will be a matter of history and the 'river rising' won't be so much a threat as a manageable reality.

The sad reality of this administration is that it has to pick up the pieces and actually do the work that should have been done for decades, but, certainly should have been done in urgency since 2002 when vortices began to dominate the troposphere and weather patterns and climate began to dramatically shift.

I hope all those effected by the Red River will return to their homes soon and we as Americans won't find it necessary to rush to 'sandbagging' the floods so much as building sustainable barriers that will simply protect the regions activities from a highly unpredictable climate pattern.

The Antithesis of Populism


Michele Bachmann Calls For Violent Revolution (click title of entry - thank you)

The bastion of the Republican Party is rhetorical populism that allows for faux beliefs that insults the USA Constitution, including, the government's role in 'individual' freedom and the laws that separate church and state. It is the only way the Republicans maintain a 'base' and without it they have no party.

It is people like Bachmann and Palin that feel there is no limit on hate mongering and advocating violence that make the party more than a poor choice in an election, but, a dangerous one.

Yesterday, Bachmann, crossed 'the line' AGAIN. Trying to maintain the level of hatred of the current administration started by Palin during her Vice Presidential Campaign, she actually called for citizens to arm themselves to fight a revolution to overthrow the government.

The problem is that people in the periphery of society, such as Timothy McVeigh and Eric Rudolph actually believe idiots like Bachman and take the call seriously. Perhaps the real question to Ms. Bachmann is 'Who's side is she on and does she actually know Osama bin Laden?'

Friday, March 27, 2009

More questions than answers.

To say this event is simply tragic, is an understatement. I want to know the extent Vincent Bustamante was involved in possible gun traffiking. To be guilty of stealing a 'shotgun' seems like a minor event compared to the potential of finding him in Mexico and possibly shot with a similar weapon.

This is more than odd. It reeks of organized crime.


Police and forensic officers look at the body of U.S. marshal Vincent Bustamante, found in the outskirts of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico Photo: AP

Mar 26, 2009 9:30 pm US/Central

U.S. Marshal Found Dead In Mexico (click here)
WASHINGTON (AP) ―
A law enforcement official says Bustamante was found with a gunshot wound to the back of his head.

Federal authorities say a deputy U.S. marshal wanted for allegedly stealing a government shotgun has been found dead in Mexico.
A spokesman for the U.S. Marshals Service says Deputy Vincent Bustamante was found dead Wednesday in Juarez.
Bustamante had been a fugitive since March 18 when he failed to show up for a court date in El Paso, Texas. He was placed on modified duty status after a pawnbroker called to report Bustamante had pawned a government shotgun.
A law enforcement official says Bustamante was found with a gunshot wound to the back of his head.
(© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)




US Intelligence Chief: Mexico Will Not Become 'Failed State' (click here)
By Gary Thomas Washington
26 March 2009
The top U.S. intelligence officer says Mexico remains stable, despite the recent surge in violence spawned by the illegal drug trade.
The Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Dennis Blair, also dismisses North Korea's claim that its upcoming space launch is for peaceful purposes.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Dennis Blair downplayed the notion that drug violence has brought Mexico to the brink of collapse. Rather, Blair says the escalating violence is a testament to the Mexican government's efforts to pressure the illegal drug cartels.
"Mexico is in no danger of becoming a failed state. [Let me] repeat that. Mexico is in no danger of becoming a failed state. The violence we see now is the result of Mexico taking action against the drug cartels. So it is in fact the result of positive moves, which the Mexican government has taken to break the baneful influence that many of these cartels have had on many aspects of Mexican government and Mexican life," Blair said....

The alliances are coming back together.

In the year 2001, the world after September 11th was a very different and united place.

Giuliani urges U.N. to adopt harsh attitude (click title to entry - thank you)
By The Michigan Daily On
October 1st, 2001
..."Recognize," Giuliani said, "that there is no room for neutrality on the issue of terrorism. You"re either with civilization or you"re with terrorism."
"The evidence of terrorism, brutality and inhumanity is lying beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center less than two miles from where we meet today," Giuliani told assembled diplomats from more that 150 countries....



A group of Afghan refugees who arrived in Pakistan last week walk in a cloud of dust yesterday after leaving a mosque where they sought refuge. WIthout any help from the United Nations thus far, they rely on the benevolence of local residents.
AP
Paul Wong


One aspect of the Afghanistan 'mission' that is clearly overlooked is that Canada has been an interested and active party in the quality of life of the people there since 1960 when it began aid programs. We were never alone in our interest in Afghanistan.

I am grateful for Russian interest and involvement to the level they feel comfortable. Perhaps through this coopertion all the issues that confront NATO and Russia can begin to be resolved as well. I know we will succeed as the more nations coming together to resolve this 'tinderbox' the more 'consistency' there will be in arms movements and control of the region. I am actually relieved Russia is involved.

I sincerely believe we are making unprecedented improvements in global relations with Russia.

It gives me great hope that Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as Kashmir will be saved from the curelty of Taliban/ al Qaeda dictorates. I also believe Pakistan and India can begin 'again' in attempts for peace and productive economies.


Canada endorses new U.S. strategy for Afghanistan (click here)
Potential terrorist attacks in hiking Afghan troop commitment
By Sheldon Alberts and Mike Blanchfield, Canwest News Service

March 27, 2009 11:53 AM
WASHINGTON — Warning Americans that al-Qaida is "actively planning" terror attacks on the United States, President Barack Obama on Friday announced plans to send 4,000 additional troops to the war in Afghanistan while dramatically increasing U.S. spending on the war.
Detailing a sweeping new U.S. strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Obama said "the situation is increasingly perilous" as the Taliban gains control over significant parts of both countries.
Canada welcomed Obama's "clarion call" to allies to do more in the troubled region as next week's NATO summit and international meeting on Afghanistan in The Hague....




People are 'scared' of the future and what is occurring to correct its course.

Pesident Obama cannot use the old line, "I don't pay attention to polls." If one doesn't it can reflect the philosophy of the last President whom 'fixed' the election of 2000.

November 13, 2007 - Impeachment (click here)
A total of 64% of American voters say that President George W. Bush has abused his powers as president. Of the 64%, 14% (9% of all voters) say the abuses are not serious enough to warrant impeachment, 33% (21% of all voters) say the abuses rise to the level of impeachable offenses, but he should not be impeached, and 53% (34% of all voters) say the abuses rise to the level of impeachable offenses and Mr. Bush should be impeached and removed from office.

March 20, 2009
Independents Split on Barack Obama Job Approval (click here)
Independent voters are split on the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president, lowering his overall job approval rating to 56% from 60% a month ago according to the latest survey from the American Research Group.
Among all Americans, 56% approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president and 37% disapprove. When it comes to Obama's handling of the economy, 49% approve and 44% disapprove.
Among Americans registered to vote, 57% approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president and 37% disapprove. A total of 47% of independent voters approve of the way Obama is handling his job and 46% disapprove. In February, 53% of independents approved and 39% disapproved.
When it comes to the way Obama is handling the economy, 47% of registered voters approve of the way Obama is handling the economy and 46% disapprove. Among independent voters, 32% approve of the way Obama is handling the economy and 57% disapprove. In February, 43% of independent voters approved of the way Obama was handling the economy and 43% disapproved.
In a turnaround from February, 40% of Americans say the national economy is getting worse. This down from 63% in February. A total of 20% say the national economy is getting better, which is up from 4% in February and is the highest in the past year....


While most people 'believe' in the new administration, the rapid fire speed at which it is deploying its strategy has Americans concerned. I also believe media sources that are attempting to 'one up' the President in popularity are taking advantage of 'uncertainty' seeking to tell folks how and what to think. While the President has repeatedly stated "The changes we have put in place will take time," the incremental changes in the economy seem to be a defeat and not a victory. Post election 'blues' one might say, but, at the same time there is a 'populous' trend that is destructive rather than constructive. Anger should not be replaced with hope.

It isn't as if the quickly placed policies weren't necessary, the economy is starting to return in areas where 'purchasing' is safe and 'the stimulus' is working, but, all this 'New America' looks to foreign and nearly too good too be true. Just as the First Lady is too good to be true. Has the military and its families ever been treated so well?

After eight years of abuse and fear, the American people are unfamiliar with anything besides oppression and exploitive politics. They aren't 'used to' the truth or transparency and the relief and reality it brings.


The first lady with troops and military families at Fort Bragg, N.C. (click here)
(Gerry Broome/AP)

The End of Excess (click here)
Kurt Anderson: "More than a year into the Great Recession, we still aren't sure if there's a bottom in sight, and six months after the financial system began imploding, it's still iffy. The party is finally, definitely over. And the present decade, which we've never even agreed what to call -- the 2000s? the oughts? -- has now acquired its permanent character as a historical pivot defined by the nightmares of 9/11 and the Panic of 2008-09. Those of us old enough to remember life before the 26-year-long spree began will probably spend the rest of our lives dealing with its consequences -- in economics, foreign policy, culture, politics, the warp and woof of our daily lives. During the '80s and '90s, we were Wile E. Coyote racing heedlessly across the endless American landscape at maximum speed and then spent the beginning of the 21st century suspended in midair just past the end of the cliff; gravity reasserted itself, and we plummeted"

The Democratic leaders have been 'in the spot light' nearly as much as the President.

Pelosi And Reid Not Lifted By Rising Tide (click here)
Public Opinion Of Congress Is At A Four-Year High, But Democratic Leaders Are Still Graded Harshly
by David Herbert
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Approval numbers for congressional Democrats are edging upward after several years in the cellar. So why are the favorability ratings of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi going down?
The Speaker's unfavorable rating jumped to 43 percent in a
Diageo/Hotline poll released March 5, up from 34 percent at the end of January. And, for the first time this year, Daily Kos/Research 2000 polling shows Pelosi's disapproval rating eclipsing her approval rating, 38-42, in a poll conducted last week.
Reid has been sliding in public opinion polls as well. His favorable/unfavorable split was 18-27 in the March 5 Diageo/Hotline poll, down from an 18-20 split in the Jan. 28 poll. His 33-46 favorable/unfavorable split in a recent Daily Kos/Research 2000 -- a 13-point differential -- is his lowest of 2009 in that poll.
The Democratic leaders' waning support coincides with a marked uptick in public approval for Congress, whose favorability ratings had languished in the near-single digits until only recently. Thirty-nine percent of Americans back Congress, according to a March Gallup poll, up 20 points since January and the body's highest rating since February 2005.
Pollster.com has tracked a consistent upward trend in congressional approval ratings beginning back in December.
The trouble area for both Democratic leaders has been independents; they have seen their unfavorable ratings among these voters jump by double digits since the beginning of the new Congress. Pelosi's unfavorable rating among indies jumped 12 percentage points to 45 percent, while Reid's negatives shot up 13 points to 30 percent....


I believe the falling polls reflects a 'populous' trend following the scandal regarding executive pay at AIG. Case in point, Senator Chris Dodd and he isn't even out campaigning for re-election. I just don't believe the polls at this time are credible so much as lacking dimension. I realize questions are questions and are supposed to be limited in their response, but, polls don't necessarily pick up 'the pulse' of the answers. What is a 'yes' TODAY, might be a no tomorrow. Dodd's poll is definately a 'populous' issue.

Dodd's Re-Election Now Rated Toss Up (click here)
The Cook Political Report just changed its race rating on Connecticut's U.S. Senate race from Likely Democrat to Toss Up.The other 2010 Senate races that Cook rates Toss Up: Florida, Kentucky, Illinois, Missouri, New Hampshire and Ohio.

There is also the fact the upward ticks in the economy aren't 'felt' at the Breakfast table of Americans that voted Democratic in 2008. There is also a large percentage of uncertain. I just don't 'buy' that Zogby got 100% participation. (click here) That isn't realistic. The reality is that 'among' those that answered the question, the number was split 50-50 for Zogby. There are also other polls that report differently.

Poll shows Mass governor taking political beating (click here)
Associated Press - March 26, 2009 12:44 PM ET
Corrected Version
BOSTON (AP) - Gov. Deval Patrick is taking a beating politically as the state's economy sags and the media reports about patronage hirings on Beacon Hill.
A WHDH-TV/Suffolk University poll released Thursday showed Patrick with a 43% unfavorability rating - nearly equal to his 44% favorability rating.
Some 47% say someone else deserves to be elected next year, and 51% say Massachusetts is headed on the wrong track.
And a potential head-to-head matchup shows Patrick losing to Treasurer Timothy Cahill by 35% to 30%.
The survey of 400 registered voters was conducted March 17 through March 20. It had a margin of error of 4.9%.

Corzine neither lacks experience or insight, however, in NJ as in the country Republican Politics has become unilaterally ruthless. With Corzine it is DEFINATELY a 'Populous' issue and not a governing issue.

Posted on Fri, Mar. 27, 2009
What Corzine reversals mean (click here)
Some experts say the N.J. governor is adapting to tough politics. Others says he's hobbled by lack of experience.
By Cynthia Burton
Inquirer Staff Writer
In nine painful days, Gov. Corzine pushed forward and pulled back a plan to eliminate the state income-tax deduction for property taxes.
Soon after Corzine announced the proposal March 10, almost every Statehouse Republican charged that the governor was attacking the middle class. The Republican State Committee released a Web ad saying Corzine's budget essentially told the middle class to "Drop Dead."...

Case 'in point' with 'response' of those participating in the surveys.

A Better Poll for Specter? (click here)

A new Franklin & Marshall poll shows Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) beating primary challenger Pat Toomey (R), 33% to 18%. However, the survey found that 42% of registered Republicans were still undecided.

A Quinnipiac Poll released yesterday showed Toomey trouncing Specter, 41% to 27%.

Update: A Political Wire reader notes that for a Pennsylvania primary the pollster should survey at least 600 to 700 members of the relevant political party. The Franklin & Marshall poll, however, gathered data on just 220 voters.

2 polls show hurdles to Specter re-election (click here)
Thursday, March 26, 2009
By James O'Toole, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Two new surveys offer grim omens for Sen. Arlen Specter's re-election prospects.
The polls, one from Quinnipiac University and the other from Franklin & Marshall College's Center for Opinion Research, contain dissonant depictions of a hypothetical Republican primary.
But their underlying messages portray a wounded incumbent potentially vulnerable to challengers in both the primary and general elections next year....

Measuring an area by 'spacial' distribution might be interesting but reflects more a socio-economic division than geographical one. All depends on how it is spun.

Red vs. Blue, Spacious vs. Compact (click here)

Greg Giroux notes how dominant the Democrats are in the geographically compact congressional districts. For instance, Barack Obama won a stunning 92 of the 100 smallest districts in the 2008 presidential race.However, the more wide-open and spacious a congressional district, the better Republicans perform. John McCain defeated Obama in 73 of the nation's 100 largest districts by land area.You can see this trend yourself on CQ's Election Results Map.

New York Race To Test Obama's Coattails (click here)
By Joe Murray, The Bulletin
Thursday, March 26, 2009

...But all of the drama surrounding the election could be extended.

A lawsuit is challenging the March 31 date was recently filed, and the suit says the election, set by Gov. David Paterson, D-N.Y., on March 11, needs a 30-45 day window for absentee ballots.

Neither candidate would object to such a delay.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Rough weather for North America tonight. Hawaii is receiving a turbulent front.


High Surf Advisory
Small Craft Advisory


March 27, 2009 (6 hour color loop from NOAA - wicked lookin' stuff)
0030z

Small Craft Advisory
Tonight: E wind around 18 kt, with gusts as high as 25 kt.
Isolated showers before midnight.
NW swell 6 feet at 13 seconds.
Waves around 8 ft.

Friday: ENE wind around 18 kt, with gusts as high as 25 kt.
Mostly sunny.
NW swell 5 feet at 13 seconds.
Waves around 8 ft.

Friday Night: ENE wind around 18 kt, with gusts as high as 25 kt.
Mostly cloudy.
NW swell 4 feet at 12 seconds.
Waves around 7 ft.


March 26, 2009
Kansas Doppler Radar Map
2352z

Posted on Thu, Mar. 26, 2009
Blizzard warnings issued for much of Kansas (click here)
BY STAN FINGER
The Wichita Eagle

WICHITA - The winter storm bearing down on Kansas could deliver a foot or more of snow to the Wichita area and as much as 20 inches in western sectors of the state, forecasters say.
Snowfall estimates for Wichita by the time the storm ends Saturday vary from 6 to 15 inches, with strong north winds creating blizzard conditions.
A blizzard warning has been issued for south-central Kansas, including Wichita, from 7 a.m Friday to 1 p.m. Saturday. A blizzard warning for southwest Kansas began at 1 a.m. today and will extend until 7 a.m. Saturday.
Several schools in western Kansas have already canceled classes for Friday, including Dodge City, Liberal, Moscow, Quinter, Fowler, Colby and Wallace County.
Some schools in the region also let classes out early today.
"This could rival the biggest snow we've ever had in Wichita," said Mike Smith, chief executive of WeatherData Services Inc., a subsidiary of AccuWeather.
The record snowfall for Wichita is 15 inches on Jan. 17 and 18 in 1962....



Weather service says 10 tornadoes in Neb., Iowa (click here)
Associated Press - March 26, 2009 4:45 PM ET
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) - The National Weather Service has confirmed 10 tornadoes touched down when a fast-moving storm moved through eastern Nebraska and into Iowa.
In Nebraska, the weather service says, 2 of the tornadoes hit near Hickman in Lancaster County on Monday. Two hit near Eagle - resulting in eight minor injuries - and one near Alvo in Cass County.
Two more tornadoes touched down in north-central Nebraska, near Brownlee and O'Neill. They did little damage.
In Iowa, a tornado was confirmed west of Missouri Valley in Harrison County, and two more were in Montgomery County, near Villisca and Sciola.
The weather service says the tornadoes ranged from EF0 to EF2 on the 1 to 5 Enhanced Fujita scale of intensity.
On the Net:
National Weather Service:
http://www.noaa.gov/

March 27, 2009
0030z

UNISYS Infrared Satellite of North and West Hemisphere (12 hour loop at title to entry - thank you)

Russia hopes to boost international effectiveness in Afghanistan - I never thought we'd be allies again.

We can stop al Qaeda. A global effort should build friendship and cooperation in achieving non-proliferation and a movement toward openness and peace. There is no reason for civilized people to treat each other as strangers and especially not enemies.

Insurgents kill 9 police in southern Afghanistan (click here)
By FISNIK ABRASHI – 15 hours ago
KABUL (AP) — Insurgents staged two attacks against police in Afghanistan on Thursday, killing nine officers and wounding six others, officials said, in the latest violence against the lightly armed force that has born the brunt of rising attacks across the country.
Washington has pushed to significantly increase the number of Afghan police and improve their training as a key part of a revised U.S. strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan that President Barack Obama is expected to unveil fully on Friday.
The strategy is aimed at countering Taliban militants, who have made a comeback following their initial defeat by U.S.-led forces in 2001. Obama has already pledged to send 17,000 additional troops to Afghanistan to battle the Taliban and could send even more as part of the administration's new strategy....



The body of a suspected Taliban militant lies lifeless on the back of a police vehicle with his heavy machine gun after he was killed in a battle with the Afghan forces on the outskirts of Ghazni province west of Kabul, Afghanistan, Thursday, March 26, 2009. Taliban militants attacked a police convoy in central Ghazni province Thursday, wounding six policemen, said regional police spokesman Iqbal Gul Sapan. Four militants were also killed in the clash in Nani village near the provincial capital, he said.(AP Photo/Rahmat Naikzad)





Everyone paying attention? Whenever Russia and the USA allied to win 'a peace' they have never failed !!!!!

Thank you !!!!! This is one good way to hit the reset button. I hope this dispells any ill intent by Russia ever again !!!!

17:27
26/ 03/ 2009

MOSCOW, March 26 (RIA Novosti) - Russia hopes to increase international effectiveness in assisting the Afghan government in the fight against terrorism and drug trafficking, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday.
Speaking ahead of Friday's Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) conference on Afghanistan, Lavrov said there must be "more coordination" on combating terrorism and drug trafficking.
Russia's proposals "are directed, first of all, at increasing the efficiency of international cooperation in the work of supporting the efforts of the government of Afghanistan in the struggle against the threat of terrorism and illegal drugs," Lavrov said....




February 2001: "It has been decided to break down all statues/idols present in different parts of the country. This is because these idols have been gods of the infidels, who worshipped them, and these are respected even now and perhaps may be turned into gods again. The real God is only Allah, and all other false gods should be removed." - Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar


Taliban leader plans to reclaim Afghanistan, U.S. says (click here)
Mullah Mohammed Omar has reassembled his power base, U.S. officials say as they outline strategy in Afghanistan. Thousands of additional U.S. troops will be sent to train Afghan forces.
By Greg Miller and Julian E. Barnes

4:14 PM PDT, March 26, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- Afghanistan's former Taliban leader is pursuing a strategy to reclaim power, the top U.S. intelligence official said today, identifying a key administration concern as the White House prepared to unveil a new plan to step up combat operations and stabilization efforts.
The Taliban leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar, was driven from power by the U.S. invasion in 2001 but has reassembled much of his base in Pakistan, where he leads a council of Islamic hard-liners accused of directing insurgent attacks across the border in Afghanistan....


NATO confirms first high-level meeting with Iran on Afghanistan (click here)
www.chinaview.cn
2009-03-27 02:52:39
BRUSSELS, March 26 (Xinhua) -- Iran and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) held their first secret and informal talks in 30 years in Brussels where NATO is headquartered, focusing on Afghanistan, the alliance confirmed here Thursday.
The meeting took place on March 9 between NATO's Assistant Secretary General for Political Affairs and Security Policy Martin Erdmann and Iran's Ambassador to Belgium, Luxembourg and the European Union, Ali-Asghar Khaji, NATO deputy spokeswoman Carmen Romero told Xinhua.
"It was a very informal contact and they basically discussed Afghanistan," she added. "You know the secretary-general (Jaap de Hoop Scheffer) has said recently that Iran should be involved in a regional approach in regard of Afghanistan."...



American Galbraith is UN deputy Afghanistan envoy (click here)
Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:47pm EDT
* Galbraith to handle political issues in Afghanistan

* U.N. denies tensions with U.S. over envoy Eide
* Had assisted Holbrooke in past (Adds quotes, details, background; byline)
By Patrick Worsnip
UNITED NATIONS, March 25 (Reuters) - The United Nations namedU.S. diplomat and academic Peter Galbraith on Wednesday to be deputy envoy to Afghanistan to assist Richard Holbrooke, U.S. point-man for Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Galbraith, 58, a former U.S. ambassador to Croatia, succeeds Christopher Alexander of Canada as political deputy to U.N. special envoy Kai Eide. Alexander completes his assignment at the end of March, U.N. spokeswoman Michele Montas said. Another deputy deals with humanitarian and development issues.
Montas said Galbraith would handle electoral, parliamentary and other political issues in the conflict-ridden nation where presidential elections are due in August, as well as peace and stability, security sector reform and human rights....


Sources: Obama to add US troops in Afghanistan (click here)
By ANNE GEARAN and PAMELA HESS – 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Concerned about the faltering war in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama plans to dispatch thousands more military and civilian trainers on top of the 17,000 fresh combat troops he's already ordered, people familiar with the forthcoming plan said Thursday.
Obama also will call for increasing aid to neighboring Pakistan as long as its leaders confront militants in the border region. The president plans to lay out his revamped strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan on Friday.
Several sources told The Associated Press the strategy includes 20 recommendations for countering a persistent insurgency that spans the two countries' border, including sending 4,000 military trainers to try to increase the size of the Afghan army....



Rudd Tells Obama Australian Forces in Afghanistan for Long Haul (click here)
By Michael Heath
March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Kevin Rudd pledged Australian troops will remain in Afghanistan “for the long haul,” even as more than two-thirds of voters said in a poll this week they were against sending more soldiers there.
Rudd, visiting Washington, held his first meeting with President
Barack Obama two days ago. The U.S. leader had been expected to ask one of his country’s closest allies to expand its 1,100-strong force in Afghanistan.
Asked on the PBS television show “NewsHour with
Jim Lehrer” whether Obama made the request, Rudd said: “No he did not,” according to an audio file. “Our discussion was about the American thinking as it’s unfolding through America’s own review of its long-term strategy.”
Rudd withdrew Australian combat troops from Iraq last year and, like Obama, has said Afghanistan is the front line in the international campaign against terrorism. He acknowledged in the interview that the war in Afghanistan is “increasingly unpopular” both in Australia and elsewhere.
“But the bottom line is this: It’s the right place to be,” he said....